Menu
Photo of Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect Joseph P. Murphy
Litigation Counsel
JMurphy@hinshawlaw.com
617-213-7044
View Bio
Joseph Murphy advises clients on consumer financial services matters. He has represented individuals and businesses facing a variety of claims …

Showing 1 post by Joseph P. Murphy.

First Circuit Concludes that "Potentially Deceptive" Language Added to Default Notice May Void Foreclosure Sale in Massachusetts

In Thompson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, the First Circuit Court of Appeals held a foreclosure was potentially void where terms in the lender's default notice arguably conflicted with terms in Paragraph 19 of the Mortgage. Although Chase's notice of default provided the Thompsons with the disclosures required under Paragraph 22 of the Mortgage, Chase's default notice further stated that the Thompsons "could still avoid foreclosure by paying the total past-due amount before a foreclosure sale takes place." The First Circuit interpreted this additional language as potentially misleading, because advising borrowers that they could make payment up to the time of the foreclosure sale differed from the Mortgage's Paragraph 19, which only allowed a reinstatement payment five days before the sale of the Property. More ›

Search
Subscribe via Email